Parking Apps Are Charging Drivers Up to 50 Percent Extra in Hidden Fees

London street parking
London street parking (image courtesy Deposit Photos)
London street parking
London street parking (image courtesy Deposit Photos)

Cashless parking was sold to drivers as a convenience. Increasingly it is a way to pay more than the sign says. As councils and car park operators retire their coin machines in favour of apps such as RingGo and PayByPhone, drivers are being charged convenience fees, text message fees and surcharges on top of the advertised tariff, and in some places those add-ons can equal a large share of the parking itself. Here is where the extra money goes, how much it can add up to, and how to keep your costs down to the price on the board.

How a 20p sign can cost a great deal more

The most common extra is the convenience fee, a charge the parking app adds for processing your payment. The amount is set between the app and the parking operator, so it varies enormously from one car park to the next. In the London Borough of Bromley, for example, a mandatory convenience charge of 20p per transaction is payable on top of the parking tariff. That sounds trivial, and on a full day’s parking it is. On a 30-minute stop costing 40p, a 20p fee is a 50 per cent mark-up.

That is the heart of the problem. Because the fees are usually flat rather than proportional, they hit short stays hardest. Consumer analysis of the major apps has found convenience charges ranging from around 17 per cent to as much as 50 per cent of the total cost of a stay, depending on location and duration. A driver popping into town for ten minutes can end up paying far more, proportionally, than someone parked all afternoon.

The fee is rarely shown on the parking sign. The tariff board tells you the cost of the space; the app tells you the cost of paying for it, and the two are not the same number. For drivers used to feeding a meter the exact change, that is an unwelcome surprise that only appears at the confirmation screen, if it appears clearly at all.

The other charges hiding in the small print

Convenience fees are not the only add-on. Many apps charge a separate fee for sending you a text message confirmation or a reminder that your session is about to end. Those reminders are useful, since overstaying can trigger a penalty, but they are not always free, and the cost is not always obvious when you opt in. Over a year of regular parking, a few pence per message becomes a meaningful sum for something a paper ticket on the dashboard used to do for nothing.

Some operators also apply surcharges linked to the type of vehicle, in a few cases charging more for higher-emission cars as a way of encouraging cleaner vehicles. Others add booking or service fees on pre-booked spaces. None of these is necessarily unreasonable in isolation, but stacked together they make it hard to know what a stay will actually cost until the payment goes through. RingGo itself acknowledges that a convenience fee is charged in some locations “for the added convenience of cashless parking”, with the amount agreed between the app and the operator.

There is a fairness question underneath all this. In many town centres the coin machines have gone, so the app is no longer the convenient option but the only option. When there is no cash alternative, a fee for the convenience of paying digitally starts to look less like a choice and more like a compulsory surcharge on parking.

How to keep your parking down to the price on the sign

You cannot always avoid the apps, but you can usually limit the extras. The following habits help:

  • Check for a fee before you confirm. The convenience charge is usually shown on the final screen. If it is high relative to a short stay, see whether a nearby council car park uses a different app or still takes card at a machine.
  • Decline paid text confirmations. Most apps let you turn off chargeable SMS reminders and rely on a free push notification or an in-app timer instead.
  • Pay for the full block you need in one go. Because convenience fees are charged per transaction, paying once for two hours is cheaper than paying twice for one hour and being charged the fee twice.
  • Keep a card machine option in mind. Where a car park still has a working machine, it may not levy the app’s convenience fee, so it can be cheaper for a quick stop.
  • Watch the clock rather than paying to extend. Extending a session remotely is handy but can attract a second convenience fee, so for predictable stays it is cheaper to buy the right amount up front.

It is also worth distinguishing between a council Penalty Charge Notice and a private parking ticket, because your rights differ. If you do receive a penalty after a cashless session, do not assume it is valid. Many tickets are successfully challenged, and our guidance on challenging an unfair fine sets out the principles that apply across automated penalties.

Why this is spreading

The shift to cashless parking saves councils and operators money. They no longer have to empty coin machines, repair vandalised meters or bank the cash, and the apps handle the payment processing in return for their cut. For local authorities under financial pressure that is an attractive trade, which is why coin machines keep disappearing. The convenience fee, in effect, moves the cost of collecting parking revenue from the operator onto the driver.

That trend is part of a broader rise in the everyday cost of using a car, from camera-enforced charges to the price of stopping on a motorway. Our look at the two-hour parking limit at motorway services shows how even a rest stop can carry a hidden bill, and the same lesson applies in the town-centre car park: read the screen before you tap pay.

There is a growing argument that the fees should be clearer at the point of parking. Consumer groups have long pushed for total pricing, the principle that the figure you are first shown should be the figure you actually pay, with no fees revealed only at the final step. In parking, the tariff board and the app price can be meaningfully different, and a driver standing at a machineless car park has little practical ability to shop around once they have already parked. Pressure is building for operators to display the all-in cost, including any convenience fee, on the signage itself.

The accessibility question is real too. Not everyone has a smartphone, mobile signal or the confidence to set up an account at the kerbside in the rain, and older drivers in particular can find a cashless-only car park very difficult to use. Where cash and card machines have been removed entirely, a fee for digital convenience effectively penalises the people least able to use the technology, which is one reason some councils have faced complaints and have kept at least one staffed or machine-based payment option in larger car parks.

What to do

Before you park, factor the app fee into the real cost rather than the advertised tariff, turn off any chargeable text reminders in the app settings, and pay once for the time you actually need. Where a card machine survives, compare it against the app for short stops. And if a penalty arrives that you think is wrong, challenge it within the deadline rather than paying on reflex. Keep a screenshot or note of what you paid and when, since a confirmation record is your best evidence if a ticket later lands for a session you know you covered. Small habits like these will not abolish the fees, but they reliably keep the gap between the sign and the screen as narrow as it can be.


Sources:

  • https://ringgo.co.uk/what-it-costs
  • https://www.bromley.gov.uk/parking/RingGo-frequently-asked-questions
  • https://moneytothemasses.com/news/car-parking-apps-how-to-avoid-extra-charges

Jarrod

Jarrod Partridge is the founder of Motoring Chronicle and an FIA accredited journalist with over 30 years of experience following motorsport and the global automotive industry. A member of the AIPS International Sports Press Association, Jarrod has covered Formula 1 races and automotive events at venues around the world, bringing first-hand insight to every race report, car review, and industry analysis he writes. His work spans the full breadth of motoring — from the latest EV launches and road car reviews to the cutting edge of motorsport competition.

Leave a Comment

More in News

The Queen Elizabeth II bridge across the River Thames at Dartford

What the Dartford Crossing Now Costs (and How to Avoid a £70 Fine)

More than 150,000 vehicles use the Dartford Crossing every day, ...

Why a Hidden 12 Percent Tax Is Inflating Every Car Insurance Bill You Pay

Look closely at your car insurance renewal and you will ...
Road traffic, London, England, UK

London Congestion Charge Rises to £18 and Electric Cars Now Pay for the First Time

If you drive into central London on a weekday, the ...
New car market holds steady as fleets drive growth

Company Car Tax Rises in 2026 as Electric Models Move to a 4 Percent Rate

Anyone running a company car will pay a little more ...

How to Find the Cheapest Fuel Near You as Pump Prices Near a Two Year High

With average petrol sitting close to 160p a litre and ...

Trending on Motoring Chronicle

Afternoon traffic on busy British motorway M1

The Most Annoying Motorway Driving Habits (And Which Ones Are Actually Illegal)

Lane-hogging, tailgating, and failing to indicate consistently rank as the ...

Last Orders for England? The Drink Drive Limit May Soon Match Scotland’s 50mg

England and Wales have had the same drink-drive limit since ...

Lamborghini Temerario GT3: Inside the Making of a New Era

With the debut of the Temerario GT3 set for the ...
seat-leon-2634168_1280

Steering Wheels: The 9 and 3 Paradigm

Modern automotive safety standards have shifted from the traditional 10-and-2 ...
Automotive image

Lamborghini debuts Temerario super sports car, hybrid successor to the iconic Huracán [Photo Gallery]

Automobili Lamborghini unveiled the Temerario[1], the legendary Italian marque’s new ...