Government Orders a Review Into Public EV Charging Costs After a 38 Percent Price Rise

Electric vehicles at SMMT Test Day 2026 showing UK EV market growth
Electric vehicles at SMMT Test Day 2026 showing UK EV market growth

Anyone who runs an electric car without a driveway already knows the sting. Charging at a public rapid point can cost three times as much per mile as plugging in at home overnight, and the gap has been widening for years. Now the government has stepped in. On 9 June the Department for Transport published the terms of reference for an independent review into the cost of public electric vehicle charging, with a full report due in autumn 2026. The aim is to work out why public charging is so expensive and what can be done to bring the price down.

For the millions of drivers who cannot charge at home, this is the first sign that ministers are treating the price of public charging as a problem to be fixed rather than a quirk of a young market. Here is what the review will cover, why the costs are so high, and how to keep your charging bills down while it runs.

What the government has actually announced

The commitment was first made at the 2025 Budget, when the government said it would review the cost of public charging and report back in autumn 2026. The published terms of reference now set out who is running it and what it will examine. The review will be led by an independent chair, Philip New, with support from the Office for Zero Emission Vehicles, the joint unit that sits across the Department for Transport and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero. It will report to ministers in both of those departments and to the Treasury, and it will be developed alongside the energy regulator Ofgem.

The backdrop is a network that has grown quickly but become pricier to use. There are now more than 120,000 public chargers installed across the UK, yet industry analysis quoted in the terms of reference estimates that average public charging prices have risen by 38 per cent since 2021. The review will look at the cost of charging across the whole network, from slower on street posts and destination chargers in retail car parks to the high powered rapid units at motorway service areas, and compare those costs with the price of filling an equivalent petrol or diesel vehicle.

Why public charging costs so much more

The size of the gap is the heart of the issue. Charging at home on a standard domestic rate works out at around 24p per kWh, and drivers on a dedicated overnight electric vehicle tariff can pay as little as 7p to 9p per kWh. Public charging is a different story. The weighted average pay as you go price in May 2026 was about 54p per kWh on standard public chargers and around 79p per kWh on rapid and ultra rapid units.

Translated into an annual bill, the difference is stark. A driver who relies on the public network pays roughly £1,760 a year to charge, compared with about £680 for someone charging mainly at home. That is more than £1,000 a year extra for the same mileage, simply because of where the electricity is bought. The drivers most exposed are the estimated millions of households without off street parking, who have no way to plug in at home and are pushed onto the most expensive tariffs. We have covered how those drivers without a driveway end up paying far more, and why public charging keeps climbing toward 79p per kWh.

The review will dig into where that money goes. Its scope includes the impact of wholesale energy prices, the wider costs that charge point operators carry, how much of any saving would actually reach drivers given the level of competition between networks, and whether tools such as dynamic time of use pricing could help. It will also consider what regulation, government funding and other policy levers could do to lower the bills.

The VAT question the review will not touch

There is one obvious lever the review has been told to leave alone. Electricity used at a public charger carries 20 per cent VAT, while electricity used to charge at home is taxed at just 5 per cent. For a driver without a driveway, that tax difference alone adds a hefty premium to every charge, and campaigners have long argued it penalises the people least able to avoid it.

The terms of reference confirm that tax costs will be reflected in the report, but the review will not make recommendations on changing tax policy. The reasoning given is that decisions on tax are made by the Treasury at fiscal events such as the Budget, and the review is not meant to pre empt those. In plain terms, the study can describe how much VAT adds to a public charge, but it cannot recommend cutting it. Any change to that 20 per cent rate would still have to come from the Chancellor.

How to cut your charging costs while the review runs

The report is not due until autumn 2026, so any changes are months away at best. In the meantime there are practical ways to keep your charging bills under control:

  • If you can charge at home at all, even occasionally, move as much of your charging as possible onto a dedicated overnight electric vehicle tariff, where rates can fall below 9p per kWh.
  • Plan longer journeys around destination chargers in supermarket and retail car parks, which are often cheaper, or free, compared with motorway rapid units.
  • Sign up to the networks you use most. Many operators offer a lower per kWh rate to subscribers or app users than the headline pay as you go price.
  • Use a live charging price comparison app before you stop, as the cost per kWh can vary widely between networks on the same route.
  • Where a journey allows, charge to around 80 per cent rather than 100 per cent, since the final stretch on a rapid charger is the slowest and least cost effective.

It is also worth keeping an eye on your home electricity costs, which feed directly into the cheaper end of charging. The July price cap change affects what home charging costs, and even with public prices high, the running cost advantage of an electric car over petrol remains large, as shown by the finding that petrol drivers spend a full year of EV charging costs on fuel well before the summer is out.

What happens next

The review will publish a single report in autumn 2026, set out in three parts. The first will describe the current cost of public charging and how it has changed in recent years. The second will assess how those costs could move to 2030 if nothing is done. The third, and the one drivers will care about most, will set out what the government and industry could do to bring the price down, covering regulation, funding, the actions of regulators and options such as market based trading schemes and dynamic pricing.

With the sale of new petrol and diesel cars due to end in 2035, the affordability of public charging is becoming a question for far more households than the early adopters who bought the first electric cars. For now, the review is a recognition of the problem rather than a solution to it. Drivers without a driveway will be watching closely to see whether autumn brings real proposals to close the gap, or simply a detailed explanation of why it exists.

The stakes are growing because the group affected is no longer a niche. Around a third of UK households have no off street parking, which leaves an estimated eight million drivers unable to plug in at home and dependent on the public network if they go electric. As more of those households move away from petrol and diesel, the price they pay at a public charger will increasingly decide whether an electric car saves them money or quietly costs them more than the car they replaced. That is the gap the review has been asked to explain, and the reason its autumn findings will be read closely by anyone weighing up the switch.


Sources:

  • https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/cost-of-public-ev-charging-review-terms-of-reference/cost-of-public-ev-charging-review-terms-of-reference
  • https://www.fleetnews.co.uk/news/ozev-publishes-terms-of-reference-for-cost-of-public-charging-review
  • https://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/369768/electric-car-charging-costs-review-launched-government
  • https://www.zapmap.com/ev-stats/charging-price-index

Jarrod

Jarrod Partridge is the founder of Motoring Chronicle and an FIA accredited journalist with over 30 years of experience following motorsport and the global automotive industry. A member of the AIPS International Sports Press Association, Jarrod has covered Formula 1 races and automotive events at venues around the world, bringing first-hand insight to every race report, car review, and industry analysis he writes. His work spans the full breadth of motoring — from the latest EV launches and road car reviews to the cutting edge of motorsport competition.

Leave a Comment

More in News

Man and woman signing hire car agreement and car insurance at airport

UK Drivers’ Car Insurance Premiums Jump 9.7 Percent to £1,184, Consumer Intelligence Reveals

The average UK car insurance quote has risen 9.7 per ...
2027 Toyota Prius

Why Catalytic Converter Theft Is Surging Again [and How to Protect Your Car]

Catalytic converter theft is rising sharply again in 2026 after ...

What Michigan USAA Drivers Must Know Before the Oct 8 Deadline

USAA has agreed to pay $647,263.74 to settle claims that ...

How Rivian Fixed 98,828 EVs Camera Bug Before Owners Even Knew

Rivian recalled 98,828 R1T, R1S, and R2 vehicles in the ...
Rear View Monitor for car reverse system. Rear area image showing to driver by video camera at rear area to help for parking and prevent accident.

Ford Recalls 11,405 Rangers After Fake Parts Knock Out the Backup Camera

Ford has recalled 11,405 model-year 2026 Ranger pickups after suspected ...

Trending on Motoring Chronicle

Costa Mesa, Californis - USA- Saturday March 29, 2025: Tesla Electric Car Dealership.

Eleven Electric Cars Now Qualify for the Full £3,750 Government Grant

The number of new electric cars that come with the ...
Freedom or safety for young drivers? UK can and must deliver both, says GEM 11/05/2026 SHARE: Images are for editorial use only. Experts gathering at Young Driver Focus in London on 13 May to press for action, not further delay Young drivers remain disproportionately at risk, with preventable deaths continuing on UK roads International evidence shows graduated driver licensing can cut crashes by up to 40% GEM Motoring Assist will return to the RAC Club, London, on 13 May as headline sponsor of Young Driver Focus 2026, renewing calls for decisive action to improve protection for newly-qualified drivers. Despite years of evidence and advocacy, the UK has yet to introduce a comprehensive system of graduated driver licensing (GDL) - a move GEM and other road safety groups say is costing young lives. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We are long past the point of asking whether we should act. The evidence is overwhelming, and the consequences of delay are measured in lives lost and families devastated.” GDL is a phased approach that allows new drivers to gain experience under lower-risk conditions before progressing to full driving privileges. Common measures include limits on late-night driving and restrictions on carrying same-age passengers during the months after passing the test. International research consistently shows crash reductions of between 20% and 40% where GDL systems are in place. In some regions of Canada, reductions in young driver deaths have exceeded 80%. In the UK, drivers aged 17 to 24 account for around 20% of road deaths, despite making up just 7% of licence holders. Inexperience, distraction and overconfidence remain key risk factors - precisely the issues GDL is designed to address. GEM stresses that a well-designed system supports rather than penalises young people, and a recent TRL review1 found no significant negative impact on access to education, employment or social activity. GEM supports a system that extends structured learning, reduces known high-risk conditions and allows young drivers to build skills progressively and safely. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We do many things well in the UK, particularly in driver training, but the current system offers too little structured support once someone passes the test. That’s where the real risk begins. “The choice is simple: continue with a system we know is failing too many young people, or take proven steps that will save lives. Doing nothing is not a neutral position - it is a decision with consequences… and Young Driver Focus offers a chance to translate the latest insight into real-world action.”

Every Driver’s Car Insurance Could Rise 3 Percent More Before Christmas, Data Shows

The average fully covered car insurance premium rose to £719 ...
Honda Prelude

Honda Prelude review: Return of a familar name, reborn as a hybrid sports coupe

The much-loved Honda Prelude is back on sale after 24 ...
659333

A weekend in the snow to mark Lamborghini Polo Storico’s tenth anniversary [Photo Gallery]

The Lamborghini Polo Storico tenth anniversary celebrations began in St. ...
Bus lane speed camera with bus and following car. Penalty-charge-in-Sheffield-bus-lane-alert.

How Long Beach’s New Speed Cameras Will Fine Drivers Starting This Fall

Drivers who cut through Long Beach's most dangerous streets are ...