Why NHTSA Is Urging Owners of 11,469 Volvo EVs and Hybrids to Stop Driving

Gas, brake, and clutch pedals
Gas, brake, and clutch pedals (image courtesy Deposit Photos)
Gas, brake, and clutch pedals
Gas, brake, and clutch pedals (image courtesy Deposit Photos)

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is telling owners of select 2020 through 2026 Volvo plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles to complete an urgent over-the-air update right away, warning that an affected car could lose its ability to brake entirely while coasting downhill. As of July 15, roughly 1,000 of the 11,469 vehicles covered by the recall still had not received the fix, and at least one serious incident tied to the defect has already been captured on video.

What Actually Goes Wrong

The defect traces back to an earlier over-the-air recall, numbered 25V-282, that Volvo issued to fix a rearview camera failure that could occur while backing up. The software patch Volvo pushed to resolve that camera problem introduced a separate flaw affecting the brakes. If an affected vehicle is in certain drive modes and coasts downhill for at least one minute and 40 seconds without the driver touching the accelerator or brake pedal, the car can lose its ability to brake altogether. Volvo opened a new recall, 25V-392, on June 12 to fix the follow-on defect, and NHTSA’s public warning this month is aimed at the roughly 1,000 owners who have not yet let the second, corrective update install.

What Volvo and NHTSA Are Telling Owners to Do

Volvo has told affected owners not to drive their vehicles until the software update completes, and to turn off regenerative braking in the meantime. Regenerative braking is tied to the coasting behavior that triggers the defect, so switching it off removes one part of the chain that leads to a loss of braking power. The update is delivered over the air, meaning it downloads and installs automatically once the vehicle has a cellular or Wi-Fi connection and is parked with the system able to complete the install, rather than requiring a dealer visit. Owners who are unsure whether their car has received the fix can check the vehicle’s software version through the Volvo app or by contacting Volvo directly. The company’s Customer Care Center can be reached at 800-458-1552 for owners who want to confirm their update status or who are having trouble getting the software to install.

Model years covered by the recall run from 2020 through 2026 and include Volvo’s plug-in hybrid and fully electric lineup, spanning both cars and SUVs equipped with regenerative braking systems tied to the affected software. That range covers vehicles like the XC90 Recharge, XC60 Recharge, S60 Recharge, and Volvo’s newer battery-electric models built on the same core platform and software stack, though owners should not assume their car is or is not included based on the model name alone. Owners who are unsure whether their specific vehicle identification number is included should check directly with Volvo or search their VIN through NHTSA’s recall lookup tool at nhtsa.gov/recalls, entering the 17-digit VIN found on the driver-side dashboard or door jamb sticker.

How a Software Fix Created a New Defect

The chain of events here is a reminder of how interconnected modern vehicle software has become. A patch written to solve one problem, a rearview camera that failed to display an image while backing up, changed code that also governs how the braking system behaves on long downhill coasts. Automakers increasingly rely on over-the-air updates to fix defects without requiring a dealer visit, which can get a repair to more owners faster than a traditional recall that requires scheduling a service appointment. The tradeoff is that a rushed or incompletely tested patch can introduce a new problem while fixing the original one, and the second defect here is more serious than the one it was meant to correct: a rearview camera failure is an inconvenience, while a total loss of braking capability while driving downhill is a life-threatening safety risk.

NHTSA’s decision to publish an urgent public warning, rather than let the over-the-air rollout run its course quietly, signals how seriously the agency is treating the roughly 1,000 vehicles still unpatched. Over-the-air updates depend on the vehicle being connected to the internet and parked long enough for the download and installation to complete, so a car that sits in a garage with weak cellular signal, or one whose owner is simply unaware an update is pending, can remain vulnerable well after the fix has shipped. This is not the first time an automaker’s remote software rollout has left a meaningful gap between the vehicles patched on day one and the stragglers still running old code weeks later, and it is a pattern regulators are watching more closely as more of the vehicle fleet becomes software-defined rather than purely mechanical.

Federal investigators have not said publicly how the second defect made it past Volvo’s internal testing before the June 12 recall, though NHTSA’s own filings show the agency treated the fix for 25V-282 and the follow-on brake defect from 25V-392 as connected events rather than two coincidental problems. Owners who received notice of the original rearview camera fix earlier this year should not assume that update, on its own, addressed the braking issue now under an urgent warning. The two recalls are related but separate, and only the June 12 update, 25V-392, resolves the brake defect.

Software-related recalls have become one of the fastest-growing categories NHTSA tracks as automakers add more connected features and driver-assistance systems tied to over-the-air updates. Tesla popularized the practice of shipping a fix to a parked car overnight rather than requiring a service appointment, and most major automakers, Volvo included, have followed with their own connected-vehicle platforms. The upside is real: a defect can reach an entire affected fleet within days rather than the weeks or months a mail-and-appointment recall can take. The Volvo case is a look at the other side of that speed, a fix that itself needed an urgent follow-up fix, and a reminder that faster does not always mean simpler when the underlying code governs something as basic as whether the brakes work.

What Owners Should Watch For

Any owner of a 2020 through 2026 Volvo plug-in hybrid or electric model should treat this as a same-day priority rather than something to handle next week. Confirm the vehicle’s software version, turn off regenerative braking if the update has not yet completed, and avoid long downhill drives, especially on mountain roads or steep grades, until Volvo confirms the fix has installed. Drivers who notice reduced braking response of any kind, especially after a long downhill coast, should stop the vehicle safely and contact Volvo immediately rather than continuing to drive.

Volvo has built its brand around a safety reputation that goes back decades, from the three-point seatbelt the company patented and gave away for free in 1959 to some of the industry’s earliest work on pedestrian detection and automatic emergency braking. A defect capable of causing complete brake failure sits at odds with that reputation, which helps explain why NHTSA moved to publicize the remaining unpatched vehicles rather than treat this as a routine, low-profile recall update.

Where to Get Help

Owners with questions about their vehicle’s recall status can call Volvo’s Customer Care Center at 800-458-1552, or contact the NHTSA Vehicle Safety Hotline at 1-888-327-4236. NHTSA’s recall lookup tool at nhtsa.gov/recalls allows any owner to search by VIN and confirm whether a vehicle is included in recall 25V-392, and whether the corrective update has been recorded as complete. The defect requires a specific, sustained downhill coast with no pedal input, so most owners are unlikely to encounter it on typical daily driving. That does not change the urgency NHTSA and Volvo are putting behind getting the fix installed on every remaining vehicle before another incident occurs.


Sources:

Jarrod

Jarrod Partridge is the founder of Motoring Chronicle and an FIA accredited journalist with over 30 years of experience following motorsport and the global automotive industry. A member of the AIPS International Sports Press Association, Jarrod has covered Formula 1 races and automotive events at venues around the world, bringing first-hand insight to every race report, car review, and industry analysis he writes. His work spans the full breadth of motoring — from the latest EV launches and road car reviews to the cutting edge of motorsport competition.

Leave a Comment

More in News

Diesel being pumped into car at petrol station

HMRC Fuel Duty Rises Will Add £2.75 to Every Tank of Petrol by March

The temporary 5p a litre cut to fuel duty, in ...
Selective focus of young handsome man sitting in pick up car in forest

Is a Pickup Truck a Car?

A pickup truck is not a car. In the United ...
Insurance Renewal Papers comparing van and cars along with Keys.

Tool Theft Now Costs UK Tradespeople an Average £2,646, Simply Business Reveals

Tool theft cost UK tradespeople an estimated £98.9 million in ...

How to Appeal a Parking Fine (and Actually Win Your Case)

You have 28 days to challenge a council parking ticket, ...

Birmingham’s Clean Air Zone Has Now Raised £57 Million From Non-Compliant Drivers

Birmingham City Council has allocated more than £57 million in ...

Trending on Motoring Chronicle

Seasonal Car Maintenance Checklist Essentials

Seasonal Car Maintenance Checklist Essentials

Seasonal maintenance is about staying ahead of the predictable failures ...
Close up of hand filling up car with fuel at a UK fuel station.

Smoother Driving Could Save UK Motorists Up to £200 a Year, Experts Say

Road safety charity GEM Motoring Assist says smoother driving can ...
Rolls-Royce Spectre Series II electric super-coupe

Rolls-Royce Spectre Series II Gains 390-Mile Range and 500kW Black Badge

Rolls-Royce has given its first electric car a substantial mid-life ...
Road traffic, London, England, UK

How Four New Camera Sites Could Catch Lancashire Drivers Making Banned Turns

Drivers who routinely swing the wrong way at a handful ...
Freedom or safety for young drivers? UK can and must deliver both, says GEM 11/05/2026 SHARE: Images are for editorial use only. Experts gathering at Young Driver Focus in London on 13 May to press for action, not further delay Young drivers remain disproportionately at risk, with preventable deaths continuing on UK roads International evidence shows graduated driver licensing can cut crashes by up to 40% GEM Motoring Assist will return to the RAC Club, London, on 13 May as headline sponsor of Young Driver Focus 2026, renewing calls for decisive action to improve protection for newly-qualified drivers. Despite years of evidence and advocacy, the UK has yet to introduce a comprehensive system of graduated driver licensing (GDL) - a move GEM and other road safety groups say is costing young lives. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We are long past the point of asking whether we should act. The evidence is overwhelming, and the consequences of delay are measured in lives lost and families devastated.” GDL is a phased approach that allows new drivers to gain experience under lower-risk conditions before progressing to full driving privileges. Common measures include limits on late-night driving and restrictions on carrying same-age passengers during the months after passing the test. International research consistently shows crash reductions of between 20% and 40% where GDL systems are in place. In some regions of Canada, reductions in young driver deaths have exceeded 80%. In the UK, drivers aged 17 to 24 account for around 20% of road deaths, despite making up just 7% of licence holders. Inexperience, distraction and overconfidence remain key risk factors - precisely the issues GDL is designed to address. GEM stresses that a well-designed system supports rather than penalises young people, and a recent TRL review1 found no significant negative impact on access to education, employment or social activity. GEM supports a system that extends structured learning, reduces known high-risk conditions and allows young drivers to build skills progressively and safely. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We do many things well in the UK, particularly in driver training, but the current system offers too little structured support once someone passes the test. That’s where the real risk begins. “The choice is simple: continue with a system we know is failing too many young people, or take proven steps that will save lives. Doing nothing is not a neutral position - it is a decision with consequences… and Young Driver Focus offers a chance to translate the latest insight into real-world action.”

How Iowa’s Hands-Free Law Cut Phone Use in Its First Year

Iowa drivers picked up their phones less often once state ...