Two in Five Drivers Now Switch Off Their Car’s Built-In Safety Systems

Track assistant in a modern car. LDWS switch button. Lane Departure Warning System of a modern car.
Track assistant in a modern car. LDWS switch button. Lane Departure Warning System of a modern car (image courtesy Deposit Photos)
Track assistant in a modern car. LDWS switch button. Lane Departure Warning System of a modern car.
Track assistant in a modern car. LDWS switch button. Lane Departure Warning System of a modern car (image courtesy Deposit Photos)

New cars are now packed with more safety technology than ever, and a striking number of drivers are switching much of it off the moment they get in. Fresh figures from the Driver Power 2026 survey suggest around two in five UK motorists disable active safety systems such as lane keeping aids and speed warnings, frustrated by beeps, tugs at the wheel and warnings they find more irritating than helpful. The result is a growing gap between the technology regulators insist new cars must have and the way real drivers actually use it.

If you are buying a new or nearly new car, this matters for both your wallet and your safety, because some of these systems genuinely help while others can be retuned rather than killed off entirely. Here is what the survey found and how to live with the tech in modern cars.

What the Driver Power 2026 survey found

The annual Driver Power survey, one of the largest polls of UK car owners, recorded a sharp fall in overall satisfaction this year. Owner satisfaction dropped to 84.2 per cent, down from 89.6 per cent in 2024, a fall of more than five percentage points. The survey points squarely at increasingly complex and often intrusive in car technology as the main reason.

Satisfaction with safety features fell by almost 8 per cent, the steepest decline of any of the survey’s ten categories. The reason is not that drivers reject safety, but that they find the way these systems are implemented annoying. An estimated 41 per cent of motorists report switching off active safety systems soon after starting the car, a figure echoed in separate research by the charity Brake, which found well over a third of drivers do the same and cite the constant alerts as a nuisance.

The frustration extends to how cars are controlled. As physical buttons give way to large touchscreens, satisfaction with cabin usability has fallen from 87.8 per cent to 81.4 per cent over three years, while satisfaction with the balance between touch and physical controls dropped from 89.1 per cent in 2024 to 84 per cent in 2026. Drivers complained of having to dig through multiple menus to do something as basic as adjusting the climate control, often while moving, which raises obvious questions about distraction.

Why new cars have so much of this tech

The flood of safety systems is not the carmakers acting alone. Vehicle safety rules now require around 18 active assistance technologies on new car models, a package that includes intelligent speed assistance, autonomous emergency braking, lane keeping assistance, driver drowsiness and attention warnings, and reversing detection. These rules apply to new models being approved for sale, which is why even modest hatchbacks now arrive bristling with sensors and chimes. We set out the full list in our guide to the safety systems every new car must now have.

The intention is sound. Intelligent speed assistance, for example, uses cameras and map data to read the limit and warn you, or gently resist, if you go over. In principle that should cut speeding and the fines and points that come with it, a particular risk given how often a sat nav or in car system can show the wrong speed limit. The problem flagged by drivers is execution: warnings that fire on the wrong limit, lane systems that nudge the wheel on faded markings, and attention monitors that scold you for glancing at a mirror.

It does not have to be this way

The survey offers a clear piece of evidence that the technology itself is not the enemy. The Tesla Model 3, the overall winner of Driver Power 2026, also topped the Safety Features category with an impressive 89.7 per cent score. That suggests drivers will accept and even welcome these systems when they are well designed, intuitive and unobtrusive, and that the dissatisfaction elsewhere is about poor implementation rather than the existence of the tech.

There is also relief on the horizon for anyone who misses real switches. Euro NCAP, the influential European crash test body, is beginning to reward manufacturers who reintroduce physical controls for essential functions such as indicators, hazard lights, wipers and the horn. Because a strong Euro NCAP rating is a powerful marketing tool, that change in stance is likely to nudge the whole industry back towards buttons and dials for the things you reach for most often, rather than burying them in a touchscreen.

The safety risk of switching everything off

While the frustration is understandable, disabling every system the moment you start the engine carries a real downside. Autonomous emergency braking, in particular, has a strong record of preventing or reducing the severity of low speed collisions, and is one system most experts would urge drivers to leave on. The danger is that a blanket switch off, born of annoyance with one intrusive feature, also turns off the genuinely protective ones.

There is a knock on effect for insurance and resale too. Active safety kit is increasingly factored into insurance pricing and into a car’s appeal on the used market, so systems that work well are part of what you are paying for. Routinely defeating them does not change the premium, but it does mean you lose the protection you are funding.

What to do

The smartest approach is to tune rather than torch. Spend time in the settings menu, ideally while parked, and adjust each system rather than disabling it wholesale. Many cars let you soften the volume or sensitivity of speed and lane warnings, which removes most of the irritation while keeping the safety net. Learn which functions reset every journey, as some, such as speed warnings, switch back on each time by regulation, and decide which you will leave alone.

If you are shopping for a new car, treat the technology as part of the test drive, not an afterthought. Try changing the temperature, the radio and the demister using only the controls, and see how distracting it feels at speed. Cars that keep physical buttons for core functions, or that let you build shortcuts to the settings you use most, will be far less frustrating to live with day to day.

Finally, keep autonomous emergency braking switched on whatever else you adjust, learn the one or two shortcuts that silence the alerts that bother you most, and give intelligent speed assistance a fair trial before judging it, as it can save you from a fine on an unfamiliar road. The Driver Power results show the industry is at a crossroads between digital ambition and everyday usability, and the cars that get the balance right are the ones owners rate most highly.


Sources:

Jarrod

Jarrod Partridge is the founder of Motoring Chronicle and an FIA accredited journalist with over 30 years of experience following motorsport and the global automotive industry. A member of the AIPS International Sports Press Association, Jarrod has covered Formula 1 races and automotive events at venues around the world, bringing first-hand insight to every race report, car review, and industry analysis he writes. His work spans the full breadth of motoring — from the latest EV launches and road car reviews to the cutting edge of motorsport competition.

Leave a Comment

More in News

Close up of hand filling up car with fuel at a UK fuel station.

Diesel Hits £100 a Tank Again as Prices Jump 17p in Less Than a Month

Diesel drivers filling up a standard 55-litre family car are ...
Pothole and Moving Car

Road Damage Caused 71 Breakdowns Every Day in 2025 and 2026 Is Already Looking Worse

Road damage caused 71 breakdowns every single day in Britain ...
Pothole and Moving Car

Road Damage Caused 71 Breakdowns Every Day in 2025 and 2026 Is Already Looking Worse

Road damage caused 71 breakdowns every single day in Britain ...

Trending on Motoring Chronicle

Ford Fiesta

Ford Fiesta Tops the UK’s Most Stolen Cars as Keyless Theft Targets 54,000 a Year

If you drive a popular hatchback or a premium SUV, ...
661254

Balenciaga | Automobili Lamborghini collaboration launch

Launching on May 21, 2025, the Balenciaga | Automobili Lamborghini ...
Freedom or safety for young drivers? UK can and must deliver both, says GEM 11/05/2026 SHARE: Images are for editorial use only. Experts gathering at Young Driver Focus in London on 13 May to press for action, not further delay Young drivers remain disproportionately at risk, with preventable deaths continuing on UK roads International evidence shows graduated driver licensing can cut crashes by up to 40% GEM Motoring Assist will return to the RAC Club, London, on 13 May as headline sponsor of Young Driver Focus 2026, renewing calls for decisive action to improve protection for newly-qualified drivers. Despite years of evidence and advocacy, the UK has yet to introduce a comprehensive system of graduated driver licensing (GDL) - a move GEM and other road safety groups say is costing young lives. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We are long past the point of asking whether we should act. The evidence is overwhelming, and the consequences of delay are measured in lives lost and families devastated.” GDL is a phased approach that allows new drivers to gain experience under lower-risk conditions before progressing to full driving privileges. Common measures include limits on late-night driving and restrictions on carrying same-age passengers during the months after passing the test. International research consistently shows crash reductions of between 20% and 40% where GDL systems are in place. In some regions of Canada, reductions in young driver deaths have exceeded 80%. In the UK, drivers aged 17 to 24 account for around 20% of road deaths, despite making up just 7% of licence holders. Inexperience, distraction and overconfidence remain key risk factors - precisely the issues GDL is designed to address. GEM stresses that a well-designed system supports rather than penalises young people, and a recent TRL review1 found no significant negative impact on access to education, employment or social activity. GEM supports a system that extends structured learning, reduces known high-risk conditions and allows young drivers to build skills progressively and safely. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We do many things well in the UK, particularly in driver training, but the current system offers too little structured support once someone passes the test. That’s where the real risk begins. “The choice is simple: continue with a system we know is failing too many young people, or take proven steps that will save lives. Doing nothing is not a neutral position - it is a decision with consequences… and Young Driver Focus offers a chance to translate the latest insight into real-world action.”

Why Every New Car Sold in Britain Must Have These 18 Safety Systems From July

From July 2026, any new car that cannot demonstrate compliance ...
Car crash vehicles ready to be scrapped

Your Car’s Tiny Bump Now Costs £3,699 To Fix. Here’s Why

A car park bump used to cost a few hundred ...
Audi Q5 Sportback e hybrid

Electric vs Hybrid: Which Saves You More Money In 2026?

Hybrid registrations are now on pace to outsell electric vehicles ...