NHTSA Investigates Nearly 1 Million GM Trucks Over Engines That Fail After Repair

2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500
2027 Chevrolet Silverado 1500

If you drive a Chevrolet Silverado, Tahoe or Suburban, a GMC Sierra, Yukon or Yukon XL, or a Cadillac Escalade with a 6.2-liter V8 engine, federal safety regulators now want proof that last year’s recall fix actually worked.

On August 20, 2026, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration upgraded its investigation into General Motors’ L87 6.2-liter V8 to a full Engineering Analysis, the most serious stage of defect investigation the agency runs before it can order a recall. The new case, EA26005, covers 997,743 trucks and SUVs from the 2021 through 2026 model years.

The detail owners should read twice: NHTSA is investigating engines that failed after GM already performed the recall repair, including trucks that received a brand-new replacement engine.

A Recall That Was Supposed to Solve This

GM issued Recall 25V-274 in April 2025 for roughly 600,000 vehicles after a run of engine failures traced to defective connecting rods and crankshafts. The automaker pointed to a supplier manufacturing and quality problem affecting L87 engines built between March 1, 2021, and May 31, 2024.

The remedy split into two paths, decided by dealer inspection. Engines that passed got a switch to thicker 0W-40 oil, a new oil fill cap and an updated owner’s manual meant to catch trouble early. Engines that failed inspection got a full replacement.

Owner complaints kept coming in. NHTSA opened a Recall Query in January 2026, case RQ26001, to test whether the fix held up. Seven months of additional failure reports later, the agency moved the case to its highest pre-recall level.

The Failure Numbers Behind the Case

NHTSA’s opening summary spells out why the investigation grew. The agency’s Office of Defects Investigation has logged 499 complaints of engine failure that happened after the recall repair. Of those, 473 involved trucks that got the oil change fix, and 26 involved trucks that received an entirely new engine and failed anyway.

Investigators also found 191 reports of L87 failures in engines built after the May 2024 cutoff written into the original recall, pulling engines that regulators had previously treated as unaffected into the case. GM told NHTSA it has received 6,953 complaints of post-repair engine failure as part of its cooperation with the agency. NHTSA has linked the investigation to one crash and one injury, with no deaths reported.

How the Defect Damages an Engine

The L87’s connecting rods and crankshafts can carry manufacturing flaws that let metal-to-metal contact build inside the engine’s bearings. Left unchecked, that contact wears down the bearing surface, starves the engine of oil pressure and can cause the crankshaft to seize mid-drive. A seized engine means a sudden loss of propulsion, a serious hazard on a highway or in traffic.

The 0W-40 oil switch GM used as its primary remedy works by running thicker oil through the engine, which keeps a stronger film between metal surfaces when a bearing has minor flaws. NHTSA’s new case asks a pointed question: does a different oil viscosity class actually stop a bearing that is already out of specification from failing, or does it only slow the problem down.

What an Engineering Analysis Actually Means

NHTSA investigations move up a ladder. A Preliminary Evaluation or Recall Query gathers complaint data and looks for a pattern. An Engineering Analysis is the last stop before the agency can force a recall, and it brings detailed information demands, component testing and direct pressure on the automaker to explain its data.

Not every Engineering Analysis results in a recall order. This case carries more consequence than a routine scope expansion, though. NHTSA is not simply asking whether more trucks need the existing fix. It is questioning whether the fix works at all. If investigators conclude the oil change does not stop the bearing failures, GM could face a second, larger recall with a costlier remedy, potentially engine replacements as the standard fix rather than the exception.

Which Vehicles Are Covered

The investigation spans the 2021 through 2026 model years of GM’s full-size trucks and SUVs built with the L87 6.2-liter V8:

  • Chevrolet Silverado 1500
  • Chevrolet Tahoe and Suburban
  • GMC Sierra 1500
  • GMC Yukon and Yukon XL
  • Cadillac Escalade and Escalade ESV

The scope change from the original recall is significant. Vehicles from the 2025 and 2026 model years, along with any L87 engine built after May 31, 2024, now fall under the investigation for the first time. Owners who traded into a newer truck specifically to skip the recall-era engines should pay close attention to this update.

What a Second Recall Could Cost

GM’s original 2025 recall already carried a real price tag. Engine replacements run into the thousands of dollars per vehicle at retail rates, a cost GM absorbed for owners who qualified under warranty or the recall itself. A second recall covering a wider window, closer to a million vehicles, and a costlier remedy would multiply that bill significantly, and it would land on a company already managing a heavy recall year across its lineup.

Owners outside the recall’s original warranty window should check whether a GM Protection Plan or a separate extended warranty covers engine replacement in the meantime. An open Engineering Analysis does not extend a warranty automatically, so a truck that ages out of coverage while NHTSA investigates could leave an owner facing a bill on a defect the government has not finished evaluating.

What Owners Should Do Now

An Engineering Analysis is an investigation, not a recall, so there is nothing new to schedule beyond the existing 25V-274 remedy for vehicles that have not had it. A few steps protect owners in the meantime.

Complete the original recall if it has not happened yet. A VIN lookup at NHTSA.gov or a call to a GM dealer confirms whether a specific truck qualifies.

Treat warning signs as an emergency. A knocking or ticking noise, a low oil pressure light or a check engine light on a 6.2-liter V8 calls for an immediate stop and a tow, not a drive to the dealer on a convenient afternoon.

Save every oil change record and repair order. If a second recall or a buyback program follows, that paperwork determines who qualifies and how fast a claim moves.

File a complaint directly with NHTSA if an engine has failed, especially after the recall repair. The 499 complaints on file are what pushed this case to its current stage, and the agency can only act on the failures it hears about.

GM issued a statement on the investigation: “The safety and satisfaction of our customers are the highest priorities for the entire GM team, and we continue to cooperate with NHTSA’s evaluation of this matter,” said Bill Grotz of GM Corporate Communications.

The automaker has not said publicly whether it disputes any of the failure figures in NHTSA’s opening summary, and GM has not announced any change to its current remedy while the Engineering Analysis proceeds. Owners hoping for a faster answer should expect this process to run for months rather than weeks. Past Engineering Analyses on other automakers’ engines have taken anywhere from six months to well over a year before NHTSA either closed the case or moved to a formal recall demand, and GM’s public updates in that stretch tend to come only when the company files a new document with the agency.

A Truck Buyer’s Warning Sign

Anyone shopping the used market for a 2021 to 2026 Silverado, Sierra, Tahoe, Suburban, Yukon or Escalade with the 6.2-liter V8 should run the VIN through NHTSA’s recall database before signing anything. A clean-looking truck can still carry an open recall if a prior owner skipped the dealer visit, and an unresolved L87 engine is not a bargaining chip worth taking on. Ask the seller directly whether the truck completed Recall 25V-274 and request the paperwork rather than a verbal answer.

Auto recalls overall are running at a five-year high in 2026, with more than 23 million vehicles pulled back industry-wide in the first six months alone. A single open recall on a used truck is common enough that skipping the VIN check has become one of the costliest shortcuts a buyer can take.


Sources:

Jarrod

Jarrod Partridge is the founder of Motoring Chronicle and an FIA accredited journalist with over 30 years of experience following motorsport and the global automotive industry. A member of the AIPS International Sports Press Association, Jarrod has covered Formula 1 races and automotive events at venues around the world, bringing first-hand insight to every race report, car review, and industry analysis he writes. His work spans the full breadth of motoring — from the latest EV launches and road car reviews to the cutting edge of motorsport competition.

Leave a Comment

More in News

Why Brake Fluid Needs Changing Every Two Years (and What It Costs)

Brake fluid soaks up water from the air, which lowers ...
The Importance of Wheel Alignment

Why Your Car Pulls to One Side (and What a Wheel Alignment Costs)

A car that pulls to one side usually needs a ...
Close up flat tyre on the road waiting

How to Tell if a Slow Puncture Is Repairable (and What It Costs)

A slow puncture can usually be repaired for £20 to ...
Is Red Coolant Better Than Green? Key Differences & Best Uses Explained

How to Check and Top Up Your Car Coolant Without Damaging the Engine

Check coolant only when the engine is cold, and keep ...
Elderly person sitting an eye examination using a Snellen Chart

What a New DVLA Eyesight Test Could Mean for 6 Million Older Drivers

The DVLA is weighing up mandatory eyesight tests for the ...

Trending on Motoring Chronicle

Freedom or safety for young drivers? UK can and must deliver both, says GEM 11/05/2026 SHARE: Images are for editorial use only. Experts gathering at Young Driver Focus in London on 13 May to press for action, not further delay Young drivers remain disproportionately at risk, with preventable deaths continuing on UK roads International evidence shows graduated driver licensing can cut crashes by up to 40% GEM Motoring Assist will return to the RAC Club, London, on 13 May as headline sponsor of Young Driver Focus 2026, renewing calls for decisive action to improve protection for newly-qualified drivers. Despite years of evidence and advocacy, the UK has yet to introduce a comprehensive system of graduated driver licensing (GDL) - a move GEM and other road safety groups say is costing young lives. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We are long past the point of asking whether we should act. The evidence is overwhelming, and the consequences of delay are measured in lives lost and families devastated.” GDL is a phased approach that allows new drivers to gain experience under lower-risk conditions before progressing to full driving privileges. Common measures include limits on late-night driving and restrictions on carrying same-age passengers during the months after passing the test. International research consistently shows crash reductions of between 20% and 40% where GDL systems are in place. In some regions of Canada, reductions in young driver deaths have exceeded 80%. In the UK, drivers aged 17 to 24 account for around 20% of road deaths, despite making up just 7% of licence holders. Inexperience, distraction and overconfidence remain key risk factors - precisely the issues GDL is designed to address. GEM stresses that a well-designed system supports rather than penalises young people, and a recent TRL review1 found no significant negative impact on access to education, employment or social activity. GEM supports a system that extends structured learning, reduces known high-risk conditions and allows young drivers to build skills progressively and safely. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We do many things well in the UK, particularly in driver training, but the current system offers too little structured support once someone passes the test. That’s where the real risk begins. “The choice is simple: continue with a system we know is failing too many young people, or take proven steps that will save lives. Doing nothing is not a neutral position - it is a decision with consequences… and Young Driver Focus offers a chance to translate the latest insight into real-world action.”

How Flip Flops and the Wrong Sunglasses Could Cost Summer Drivers £100 and Three Points

The first warm spell sends millions of drivers reaching for ...
1. Spectre Inspired by Primavera Evanescent (4)

Rolls-Royce Spectre Inspired by Primavera: a springtime vision to carry into the year ahead [Photo Gallery]

Rolls-Royce Motor Cars has today announced Spectre Inspired by Primavera, ...
Rachel Reeves

Rachel Reeves’ Car Tax Changes Mean Millions Of Drivers Will Pay More From April

The annual car tax adjustment has arrived again, and this ...

Aston Martin honours road race heritage at Monterey Car Week [Photo Gallery]

Aston Martin is taking a leading role at the 2026 Monterey Car ...
Automotive image

Automobili Lamborghini and Italian State Police: 20 years of collaboration in service to the nation [Photo Gallery]

Automobili Lamborghini and the Italian “Polizia di Stato” are celebrating ...