Nearly 10,000 Surrey Drivers Owed Refunds After Council’s Six-Year Parking Blunder

Parking ticket under wind screen wiper of a car
Parking ticket under wind screen wiper of a car (image courtesy Deposit Photos)
Parking ticket under wind screen wiper of a car
Parking ticket under wind screen wiper of a car (image courtesy Deposit Photos)

If you have ever parked in a council car park in Esher, Cobham, Hersham, Walton-on-Thames or Weybridge since January 2020, there is a real chance you were wrongly fined. Elmbridge Borough Council has admitted that 9,318 Penalty Charge Notices (PCNs) were incorrectly issued across 17 of its car parks over the past six years, and is now preparing to pay back an estimated £308,000 to affected drivers.

The council announced the error on 11 May 2026, along with an apology and a commitment to open a refund scheme in June, once formal approval is granted by councillors at the Cabinet meeting on 19 May. Every driver who paid one of these incorrect fines is entitled to claim it back, but the council has no way to contact people directly, so it is entirely up to motorists to come forward.

A standard Elmbridge PCN costs £50, reduced to £25 if paid within 14 days. With 9,318 notices issued in the affected category, the total exposure reflects a mix of drivers who paid the reduced and full amounts. The council has confirmed the £308,000 refund bill will come from existing financial reserves, with no cuts to services or new charges introduced to cover the cost.

What Went Wrong and Why the Fines Were Invalid

The error stems from a failure to properly follow the legal process for establishing parking restrictions in council-operated car parks. Under the Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007, local authorities must follow strict procedural steps before they can legally issue PCNs at a given location. These include proper consultation, the formal making of a Traffic Regulation Order or equivalent arrangement, and correct signage.

Elmbridge has confirmed the problem involved how paperwork for introducing the fines was handled and a failure to undertake full consultation when introducing new parking arrangements. In plain terms, the council was enforcing restrictions it had not legally put in place. Any PCN issued without the correct legal foundation is unenforceable, and drivers who paid these fines are entitled to their money back.

The affected notices fall into two categories. First, fines issued between 8am and 9am or between 6pm and 7pm in 11 specific car parks since 6 January 2020, a window when restrictions were not lawfully in force. Second, fines issued on any Sunday across 17 car parks since 24 April 2022, where Sunday restrictions were similarly not properly established.

Dawn Crewe, Strategic Director at Elmbridge Borough Council, said in a statement: “I am very sorry that a procedural error has led to parking fines being issued incorrectly in some of our car parks. I understand this will be frustrating for those affected, and I want to reassure residents and visitors that we are doing everything we can to put this right. The refund process will be kept as straightforward as possible, with refunds issued within two weeks of successful application, and we will make sure the scheme is widely publicised so that everyone who may be affected is aware.”

The Full List of Affected Car Parks

The following car parks in Esher are affected for fines issued between 8am and 9am or between 6pm and 7pm since 6 January 2020: Berguette, Civic Centre, Heather Place, and Highwayman’s Cottage. In Cobham, the affected car parks are Cedar Road and Hollyhedge Road. In Walton-on-Thames, Drewitt’s Court and Manor Road are included, and in Weybridge the affected sites are Churchfield Road, Monument Hill, and Baker Street.

For Sunday fines issued since 24 April 2022, the list is broader. All of the above car parks are included, plus Mayfield Road in Hersham; Ashley Park, Station Avenue, and Walton Park in Walton-on-Thames; and Heath North and Heath South in Weybridge. Ashley Park has additional criteria: fines issued between 8am and 10am or between 6pm and 7pm since January 2020 are also in scope for refunds.

If you are unsure whether a particular visit to any of these car parks resulted in a fine, check any records you have to hand: bank statements, email confirmations of payment, or the physical PCN if you still have it.

How to Claim Your Refund

The refund scheme cannot open until councillors formally approve it at the Elmbridge Cabinet meeting on 19 May 2026. If approved, the scheme goes live in June, though an exact date has not yet been confirmed. Once it opens, there are two ways to apply: online through the council website at elmbridge.gov.uk, or by calling 01372 474 474.

When making your claim, you will need to provide your name and contact details, your vehicle registration number, proof that you paid the fine, and your bank details for the refund transfer. The council has committed to processing successful claims within 14 days of receiving a complete application.

No interest will be added to the refund amount. The council considered this but decided against it, citing the need to be responsible with public money. The refund covers the PCN amount only, whether that was the full £50 or the discounted £25 early-payment rate.

Drivers who were subject to debt recovery or bailiff action over one of these invalid fines will be contacted directly by the council, as their details are already held on file. If you know you went through enforcement action and want to start the process without waiting, call 01372 474474.

There is an important deadline to note: all claims must be received by March 2027. At that point, Elmbridge Borough Council is due to be dissolved and absorbed into the newly formed East Surrey council as part of the local government reorganisation in Surrey. Do not leave it too late.

This Is Not the First Time a Council Has Done This

Elmbridge is not alone. The regulatory framework governing council parking enforcement is detailed, and the consequences of procedural failures fall on ordinary drivers who paid fines in good faith with no reason to suspect anything was wrong.

Reading Borough Council went through a near-identical situation when it discovered that five Traffic Regulation Orders were not properly in place on certain roads, invalidating 6,136 PCNs issued between 2013 and 2024. Reading chose to offer refunds with added interest, a decision Elmbridge has not replicated. Drivers who feel that the absence of interest is unjust can raise a complaint with the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman at lgo.org.uk.

The Civil Enforcement of Parking Contraventions (England) General Regulations 2007 requires councils to complete consultation, formal orders, and correct signage before enforcement action is legally valid. When councils miss steps in this process, often due to administrative oversight rather than deliberate wrongdoing, it is drivers who pay the price. Staff involved in day-to-day enforcement have no obligation to verify the legal foundation of the restrictions they are applying, and drivers who receive a PCN have no practical way to know whether the underlying restriction was lawfully made.

Statistics from the Traffic Penalty Tribunal, the independent body that handles parking appeals outside London, show that around 50% of formal appeals succeed. That is a striking figure. For most drivers, though, the discounted fine is paid quickly to avoid the penalty doubling, and the legality of the restriction behind it is never questioned.

Know Your Rights: Contesting a PCN Anywhere in England

If you receive a PCN that you believe was wrongly issued, whether in Elmbridge or anywhere else in England, you have specific statutory rights. Every council PCN must be followed by a Notice to Owner if it goes unpaid, and you have 28 days from that point to make formal representations to the issuing authority. One of the statutory grounds for challenge is procedural impropriety on the part of the authority, which is the exact legal basis on which Elmbridge’s fines were invalid.

If the council rejects your representations, you can appeal to an independent adjudicator at no cost. In London this is the Parking and Traffic Appeals Service. Elsewhere in England and Wales, it is the Traffic Penalty Tribunal. Both bodies are entirely independent of the issuing council, and their decisions are binding on the authority. The council cannot ignore a ruling in your favour.

For drivers who suspect a fine may have been wrongly issued because a restriction seemed unusual, it is worth submitting a Freedom of Information request to the council asking for the Traffic Regulation Order that underpins the restriction. If the order cannot be produced, or was not properly made, the fine has no legal basis.

Elmbridge has committed to fixing the underlying legal framework alongside the refund scheme, including extending free parking and reducing charging hours at town centre car parks from July 2026. The council also froze its parking charges in the 2026/27 budget. These are welcome concessions, but they do not change the fact that nearly 10,000 drivers paid fines over six years that should never have been issued.


Sources:

Jarrod

Jarrod Partridge is the founder of Motoring Chronicle and an FIA accredited journalist with over 30 years of experience following motorsport and the global automotive industry. A member of the AIPS International Sports Press Association, Jarrod has covered Formula 1 races and automotive events at venues around the world, bringing first-hand insight to every race report, car review, and industry analysis he writes. His work spans the full breadth of motoring — from the latest EV launches and road car reviews to the cutting edge of motorsport competition.

Leave a Comment

More in News

London. UK- May 04. 2026. The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency sign by the entrance to a driving test centre with the building in the background. — Photo by MingPhoto

DVLA Medical Licence Delays Averaged 11 Weeks All Year, Official Figures Confirm

Drivers who declare a medical condition on a licence renewal ...
Upset woman talking on phone against background of broken car - stock image

Half of Young Drivers Are Buying Fake Car Insurance on Social Media

Half of Britain's youngest drivers are buying car insurance through ...
Parking ticket for a penalty or fine stuck on Range Rover cars windscreen, captured in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, London, England, UK — Photo by Brasilnut

Just 0.32% of Unfair Parking Charges Ever Get Overturned by Drivers

Every year, private parking companies issue tens of millions of ...

Why Truckers Using These 12 Logging Devices Now Risk Being Pulled Off the Road

Truckers still running one of 12 electronic logging devices that ...
Freedom or safety for young drivers? UK can and must deliver both, says GEM 11/05/2026 SHARE: Images are for editorial use only. Experts gathering at Young Driver Focus in London on 13 May to press for action, not further delay Young drivers remain disproportionately at risk, with preventable deaths continuing on UK roads International evidence shows graduated driver licensing can cut crashes by up to 40% GEM Motoring Assist will return to the RAC Club, London, on 13 May as headline sponsor of Young Driver Focus 2026, renewing calls for decisive action to improve protection for newly-qualified drivers. Despite years of evidence and advocacy, the UK has yet to introduce a comprehensive system of graduated driver licensing (GDL) - a move GEM and other road safety groups say is costing young lives. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We are long past the point of asking whether we should act. The evidence is overwhelming, and the consequences of delay are measured in lives lost and families devastated.” GDL is a phased approach that allows new drivers to gain experience under lower-risk conditions before progressing to full driving privileges. Common measures include limits on late-night driving and restrictions on carrying same-age passengers during the months after passing the test. International research consistently shows crash reductions of between 20% and 40% where GDL systems are in place. In some regions of Canada, reductions in young driver deaths have exceeded 80%. In the UK, drivers aged 17 to 24 account for around 20% of road deaths, despite making up just 7% of licence holders. Inexperience, distraction and overconfidence remain key risk factors - precisely the issues GDL is designed to address. GEM stresses that a well-designed system supports rather than penalises young people, and a recent TRL review1 found no significant negative impact on access to education, employment or social activity. GEM supports a system that extends structured learning, reduces known high-risk conditions and allows young drivers to build skills progressively and safely. GEM head of road safety James Luckhurst said: “We do many things well in the UK, particularly in driver training, but the current system offers too little structured support once someone passes the test. That’s where the real risk begins. “The choice is simple: continue with a system we know is failing too many young people, or take proven steps that will save lives. Doing nothing is not a neutral position - it is a decision with consequences… and Young Driver Focus offers a chance to translate the latest insight into real-world action.”

How Iowa’s Hands-Free Law Cut Phone Use in Its First Year

Iowa drivers picked up their phones less often once state ...

Trending on Motoring Chronicle

Average Speed Camera on UK Motorway

Why Derbyshire Has More Mobile Speed Camera Sites Than Any Other County in Britain

Every county in England and Wales has mobile speed camera ...
Parents can have a lesson at Young Driver to make sure bad habits haven’t slipped in

Only 44 Percent of UK Drivers Think They Would Pass Today’s Theory Test

Fewer than half of UK drivers believe they would pass ...
Close up of hand filling up car with fuel at a UK fuel station.

What a Global Oil Flashpoint Means for the Price of Diesel in Britain

Diesel drivers in Britain are facing renewed pressure at the ...
Young Driver teaches children to drive from as young as nine in real cars

Why Drug-Driving Has Overtaken Drink-Driving as Britain’s Top Road Danger

Drug-driving convictions have overtaken drink-driving convictions in Britain for the ...
Parking ticket under wind screen wiper of a car

Why 1,500 Drivers in Leicester Got a £70 Parking Fine They Never Saw Coming

More than 1,500 drivers in Leicester have received £70 penalty ...